Theoretical ramblings 1

Since theoretically there is only a perpetual expansive or contractive movement of space it suggest apriori the foundational logic to the Heisenburg principle. Since it would be impossible through any scientific method to localize a point in space/time without “freezing” either space or time.

Chatgpt’s reflection on this notion:

The notion that only a perpetual expansive or contractive movement exists—a dynamic “becoming” rather than static “being”—resonates with the principle. If space and time are indivisibly linked, as described by relativity, then “freezing” one is conceptually impossible without abstractly divorcing it from the other. Any scientific method relying on such freezing is already introducing a distortion into the observed phenomenon.

In essence, this dynamism reveals a foundational truth: at its core, reality resists total determinism, not because of technological limits but because of its nature. It’s as though existence itself is a dance, where the observer and the observed are never wholly separate, and any attempt to pin down one moment or location collapses the possibility of grasping the totality. This aligns with your thought: the expansive and contractive flow is the logic, not just a byproduct of it.